|
Xmax
Nov 2, 2006 18:05:49 GMT -7
Post by rodny on Nov 2, 2006 18:05:49 GMT -7
I think this may be a good sub for IB, the bad news is $1300 15” Electrical Q Value -Qes: 0.58 Mechanical Q Value -Qms: 3.62 Total Speaker Q Value -Qts: .501 Free Air Resonance -Fs: 19.10 Hz Equivalent Compliance -Vas: 207.0 liters One-Way, Linear Excursion -Xmax: 54 mm Efficiency - SPL 1W/1m: 85.81 dB SPL Effective Piston Area -Sd: 810 cm^2 DC Resistance -Re: 4.2 ohm Nominal Impedance -Znom: Dual 2 ohm Thermal Power Handling -Pe: 2000 W Force Factor -Bl: 18.16
|
|
moro
New Member
Posts: 12
|
Xmax
Nov 2, 2006 19:46:37 GMT -7
Post by moro on Nov 2, 2006 19:46:37 GMT -7
ahh the RE XXX I do believe.
|
|
|
Xmax
Nov 2, 2006 20:20:06 GMT -7
Post by rodny on Nov 2, 2006 20:20:06 GMT -7
ahh the RE XXX I do believe.
|
|
|
Xmax
Nov 3, 2006 11:12:32 GMT -7
Post by crackyflipside on Nov 3, 2006 11:12:32 GMT -7
That is some scary movement, 4.25" peak to peak
|
|
moro
New Member
Posts: 12
|
Xmax
Nov 3, 2006 13:11:33 GMT -7
Post by moro on Nov 3, 2006 13:11:33 GMT -7
I have not seen a independant review of thier new 2006 series XXX drivers with that huge claimed Xmax. The XXX series does have a good past reputation though.
|
|
|
Xmax
Nov 7, 2006 22:33:12 GMT -7
Post by ficaraudio on Nov 7, 2006 22:33:12 GMT -7
I know that sub... lol Xmag is good for it. Suspension does start to stiffen up after about 3.5" Good luck sticking those things up in the attic Not 100% the driver I had in mind as we had vendor issues at the time with the Neo we wanted. So the dealers got their way after all as they were screaming "make it huge" the whole time. Driver would have weighed less than half with the neo. Much more "performance" oriented at that point for car audio.
|
|