jeffp
New Member
Posts: 41
|
Post by jeffp on Jan 12, 2006 9:22:39 GMT -7
I'm trying to think outside the box. Bad pun I know. ;D Anyway wondering if anyone has given something like this a try. Somewhat of a hybrid between a manifold and line array? Not sure how much acoustic output benefit this would have. I would think quite a bit as it's directing the sound into the desired area. Have I lost my mind? The design isn't exactly what I'd do but it gives the general idea. img15.imgspot.com/?u=/u/06/11/12/betamanifold1137086387.gifJeff
|
|
|
Post by ThomasW on Jan 12, 2006 9:30:06 GMT -7
It will function as a line array no more no less. Look at Paul W's setup you'll find a similar design. www.geocities.com/pnwright3/Gemini_subs.htmlAlso please use only one thread per any specific project. That keeps info centralized. Creating a separate thread for each question confuses everyone. The forum's software doesn't allow me to merge threads
|
|
jeffp
New Member
Posts: 41
|
Post by jeffp on Jan 12, 2006 9:44:24 GMT -7
Sorry wasn't sure this is something I would use in my project as the cost/difficulty to build it might out weigh the advantages it produces.
Looking at Paul's configuration it's still a square configuration using 9 drivers so 3 on each side makes since. What I was looking at was use in 4 or 6 total drivers either using 2 or 3 on each side of the triangle.
If it does function like a line array (you'd certainly know better then I) then it seems like the route to go as the opening doesn't have to be as large as a typical flat line array we normally see.
|
|
|
Post by ThomasW on Jan 12, 2006 9:54:13 GMT -7
Either design has an overly small opening in comparison to a flat panel line array. The flat panel array will have the best sound since there's an opening as large as the Sd for each driver in the line.
Both Paul W's and your idea don't provide the benefit of mechanical canceling one gets from a manifold where the drivers actually face each other
|
|
|
Post by coldie on Jan 12, 2006 10:58:04 GMT -7
Actually, this method will provide a bit of cancelation...
Assuming you've doubled the number of drivers, you'll only add 1.4 x the force pushing on the line array.
Not sure if it's worth it, but there ya go.
|
|